tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953008377950396317.post8138651086071342249..comments2024-03-17T06:13:15.256-07:00Comments on SearchReSearch: Scoping in searchDan Russellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13603209997260423532noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953008377950396317.post-85246784560908754472014-10-05T14:22:03.475-07:002014-10-05T14:22:03.475-07:00Dr. Russell it is very interesting. I came to this...Dr. Russell it is very interesting. I came to this post after reading your post about Scoping in 2012, mentioned in 2014. Many things have changed, for example, lolcatz site is not there anymore. <br /><br />What doesn't change is the core of your post and after reading the 3 posts that relates to the topic, I have a better understanding. Each post gives more detail and different ways to look scoping.<br /><br />Glad you always keep us updated. And congratulations, your posts are always timeless. Ramon Gonzalezhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16129830563029534511noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953008377950396317.post-58499622068722525792010-10-19T20:32:14.585-07:002010-10-19T20:32:14.585-07:00Nice post Dan! Having just finished teaching a tw...Nice post Dan! Having just finished teaching a two-week session with high school age students, I was surprised to discover that they didn't really know the difference between a question you can look up the answer to on Google and one you can't. Why? I think it has to do with scoping... To them, if there's no Wikipedia or Dictionary.com answer, there's not an answer at all. They don't really get how to scope in other ways.<br /><br />Glad you wrote about this topic, so I can do a better job scaffolding their question-posing the future.Paul Franzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10454463015164323230noreply@blogger.com