I have to say that I'm tempted to just pose questions from now on, and let the discussion just roll on forward. The SRS team is getting to be very, very good!
And the questions were:
You might, if you're lucky, recognize this as the Colosseum. (Which is, as it turns out, a misnomer--the name "Colosseum" comes from the name of a giant statue, a colossus, that stood nearby. People, being people, started calling that whole area, "the Colosseum.")
But let's suppose you don't immediately recognize it. Then what?
If you try to search-by-image with this, it doesn't work. Why not? Too much noisy stuff in the periphery--the trees, the hill, the streets, the pathways.
So here's a strategy to try when you're stuck like this: use a distinctive subsample of the whole image.
Here's what I did. I just cropped out this much of the original, some part of the entire image that I thought many other people would photograph as well:
And then did a search-by-image for that. Look what I find. No obvious and direct answers, but a bunch of sites that have very similar images.
If you do 10 seconds of clicking around on those hits, you'll figure out that it's the colosseum straight away.
Now we know this is the colosseum. (And a few seconds of doing image search on the term "Colosseum" will verify this.) WHERE am I standing?
If you do a Google Maps search and switch into Satellite mode (and have WebGL turned on), it basically starts running Google Earth for you.
Then, search for Colosseum, and you'll get something that looks like this:
Just look at this 3D projection for a second and you can tell that I must be standing somewhere over on the right-side of the picture. Then, by using the 3D controls, I can line things up to try and more-or-less reproduce the picture from above--this time, just by using Google Maps.
It's not exact, but pretty close. (The trees are all 3D modeled as well; they're quite as precise as you might like.) Keep reminding yourself... this is NOT a photograph--this is a 3D reconstruction. You still need to validate this location!
In any case, you can now switch back to regular Map view and see what the name of that street is. You can even double-check by using the Streetview pegman (the yellow stick figure you can drag around to get Streetview images) and getting as close as possible.
Looking at the map, it's pretty clear that I was walking on the path labeled Viale della Domus Aurea. A quick search for
[ Domus Aurea ]
shows us that this was the name of the fabulous house/villa/estate that the Roman Emporer Nero built on the site.
As our incredible SRS readers found out, the Domus Aurea ("Golden House") was a huge place that covered most of the hillside where I was walking.
After Nero died (by suicide in 68 AD), the place was more or less demolished and repurposed for other reasons. It's worth noting that the Colosseum we know was NOT there when Nero was alive. In his day, that area was kind of a swampy marsh that he converted into a lake for his landscaping. Since Nero was massively embarrassing to the senate and people of Rome, on the site of Nero's lake, Vespasian built most of the Flavian Amphitheatre (now known as the Colosseum), which could be flooded to stage naval battles. He left the statue, the Colossus Neronis at the side. In short order Trajan built an equally large bath complex on the site. Forty years after construction, the Domus Aurea, was history, buried and preserved.
As it turns out, I visited the Domus in 2005 on my last trip to Rome. Alas, the place was quickly deteriorating even then, and it wasn't long until the authorities closed up the site, pending reconstruction.
It's not a great photo, but it's about as good as others I've seen on the web, showing the frescoed ceilings of the great barrel-vaulted rooms.
And since the place is now closed to visitors (see the Construction of the Domus Aurae website), it really gets much less than 1% of the traffic to the Colosseum. (Technically, the Colosseum gets an infinitely large fraction of traffic, since it's 4M-to-0 ratio, but I digress.)
Oddly enough, while writing this note up, I found another photo of me taken from directly across the street from the mystery photo of above. (Check on the notch in the rim of the Colesseum--you'll see they STILL haven't repaired it in 8 years.)
There are a couple of search lessons here:
1. Sometimes taking a sub-picture of the whole picture will allow search-by-image to work correctly. As you saw, I selected just the most likely part of the image to be photographed by other people. This is an example of looking for the most specific case, and is a strategy we'll return to in the future.
2. Google Maps now includes Earth and we have the Pegman back to get to Streetview. And with this, we now have all new kinds of search capabilities that previously you could only do with Earth. Welcome back, little yellow man!
And the questions were:
1. I'm standing on a pathway that's named for the building that was once the glory of this hill. What's the name of that building?
2. Once you know that, who built this amazing building near where I'm standing, and why do only 1% of the people who visit the building shown above, actually walk across the street and visit the equally remarkable building that was once here. (That is, why is this building near where I'm standing so much less popular?)
You might, if you're lucky, recognize this as the Colosseum. (Which is, as it turns out, a misnomer--the name "Colosseum" comes from the name of a giant statue, a colossus, that stood nearby. People, being people, started calling that whole area, "the Colosseum.")
But let's suppose you don't immediately recognize it. Then what?
If you try to search-by-image with this, it doesn't work. Why not? Too much noisy stuff in the periphery--the trees, the hill, the streets, the pathways.
So here's a strategy to try when you're stuck like this: use a distinctive subsample of the whole image.
Here's what I did. I just cropped out this much of the original, some part of the entire image that I thought many other people would photograph as well:
And then did a search-by-image for that. Look what I find. No obvious and direct answers, but a bunch of sites that have very similar images.
If you do 10 seconds of clicking around on those hits, you'll figure out that it's the colosseum straight away.
Now we know this is the colosseum. (And a few seconds of doing image search on the term "Colosseum" will verify this.) WHERE am I standing?
If you do a Google Maps search and switch into Satellite mode (and have WebGL turned on), it basically starts running Google Earth for you.
Then, search for Colosseum, and you'll get something that looks like this:
Just look at this 3D projection for a second and you can tell that I must be standing somewhere over on the right-side of the picture. Then, by using the 3D controls, I can line things up to try and more-or-less reproduce the picture from above--this time, just by using Google Maps.
It's not exact, but pretty close. (The trees are all 3D modeled as well; they're quite as precise as you might like.) Keep reminding yourself... this is NOT a photograph--this is a 3D reconstruction. You still need to validate this location!
In any case, you can now switch back to regular Map view and see what the name of that street is. You can even double-check by using the Streetview pegman (the yellow stick figure you can drag around to get Streetview images) and getting as close as possible.
Looking at the map, it's pretty clear that I was walking on the path labeled Viale della Domus Aurea. A quick search for
[ Domus Aurea ]
shows us that this was the name of the fabulous house/villa/estate that the Roman Emporer Nero built on the site.
As our incredible SRS readers found out, the Domus Aurea ("Golden House") was a huge place that covered most of the hillside where I was walking.
After Nero died (by suicide in 68 AD), the place was more or less demolished and repurposed for other reasons. It's worth noting that the Colosseum we know was NOT there when Nero was alive. In his day, that area was kind of a swampy marsh that he converted into a lake for his landscaping. Since Nero was massively embarrassing to the senate and people of Rome, on the site of Nero's lake, Vespasian built most of the Flavian Amphitheatre (now known as the Colosseum), which could be flooded to stage naval battles. He left the statue, the Colossus Neronis at the side. In short order Trajan built an equally large bath complex on the site. Forty years after construction, the Domus Aurea, was history, buried and preserved.
As it turns out, I visited the Domus in 2005 on my last trip to Rome. Alas, the place was quickly deteriorating even then, and it wasn't long until the authorities closed up the site, pending reconstruction.
Domus Aurae interior. September, 2005. Photo by Dan. |
It's not a great photo, but it's about as good as others I've seen on the web, showing the frescoed ceilings of the great barrel-vaulted rooms.
And since the place is now closed to visitors (see the Construction of the Domus Aurae website), it really gets much less than 1% of the traffic to the Colosseum. (Technically, the Colosseum gets an infinitely large fraction of traffic, since it's 4M-to-0 ratio, but I digress.)
Oddly enough, while writing this note up, I found another photo of me taken from directly across the street from the mystery photo of above. (Check on the notch in the rim of the Colesseum--you'll see they STILL haven't repaired it in 8 years.)
There are a couple of search lessons here:
1. Sometimes taking a sub-picture of the whole picture will allow search-by-image to work correctly. As you saw, I selected just the most likely part of the image to be photographed by other people. This is an example of looking for the most specific case, and is a strategy we'll return to in the future.
2. Google Maps now includes Earth and we have the Pegman back to get to Streetview. And with this, we now have all new kinds of search capabilities that previously you could only do with Earth. Welcome back, little yellow man!
Remji - thanks for the info on links. Apologies if this doesn't work First attempt and typed it all out from Chromebook screen to Android. This seems like a lot of work unless you get pop-up.
ReplyDeleteDr. Russell I use Chromebook (with Google Earth Lite Mode available) and Android (Google Earth basic version available) so no 3D available (that I am aware of). Things probably work a little different on your Mac. Because I didn't know what WebGL was I looked it up. For others like me it is Web Graphics Library needed for 3d display & requires video card to support. I tried downloading a third party WebGL but it performed poorly. My point really is can you explain why you went to 3D to locate your reverse bearing to the colosseum. I used Streetview because its all I have I believe. Pegman works quite well on Chromebook, not so good on Android.Thanks.
Rosemary -- Yes, it's true. There are many different browsers, configurations, and setups... all of which influence how searches work (or in the case of a Chromebook, don't work for WebGL-based applications).
DeleteWRT *why* I did it that way, I did it partly to show another method of solving the problem (the more tools you have in your toolbox, the better off you are). You're right, of course--you CAN do this just with Streetview.
I'm happy Pegman is back (he was gone for quite a while), but sorry to hear about his performance on Android. Those folks are working hard, so I'm sure things will improve!
Rosemary - you seem to have the format correct - the link was live, but the url didn't work for me…
Delete[https://www.support.google.com/blogger/answer/41379?hl=en]
checked that url and found that access to Goo support/help doesn't include the "www" business -
see the search query & results here, note the url for the Google Help site: https://support.google.com/ (no www… perhaps Dan can explain…? above my pay grade here at HHS/Conseillers en Gestion et Informatique.)
also true for the general Blogger help site.
fwiw: I always copy & paste the urls, much less chance of a typo - also use tiny url for long addresses - less characters to keep track of (also use You Tube's share urls for their material)
It is a cumbersome process, but after you do it a few times and find a way that works best for you, it'll become second nature for you. Again, congrats on getting the HTML format sorted out and good luck with future links - think you will find it streamlines your comments, increases their readability and increases the number of readers that will check them out.
Dan said The SRS team is getting to be very, very good!
ReplyDeleteAw shucks
jon
You said that Google image search would not identify the Colosseum. FWIW: I simply dragged the image from my email client to a Google Chrome image search and found it immediately?
ReplyDeleteAlec -- Could you shoot me an email with a screen shot of what results you got? All I saw was the SearchResearch blog. If you're getting something different, I'd love to understand what (and why!). Thanks.
DeleteI can't wait to share this with my 6th graders. A search lesson AND some information for their ancient history class. Little things make me so happy! (And I got the SRS blog when I dragged over the image.)
ReplyDelete