Friday, February 28, 2014

Answer: How do I tell where I want to go?

Reading through the comments, it seems most people didn't have a hard time with Wednesday's Challenge.  That's excellent!  Sometimes Challenges should just be fun, a chance to practice finding something that doesn't take a million hours, but leads to something unexpected and interesting.    

The challenge was... assuming I'm at the JNB airport...  

1.  I want to take a taxi to Orange Farm.  What special things do I have to do to hail a taxi there from JNB airport?  
2.  Can you find a statue that tells you how to get to the Central Business District using this unorthodox language?  

To start, what's JNB?  We know it's an airport, so the quick search:  

     [ JNB ] 

 reveals that this is O. R. Tambo International Airport, the airport near the city of Johannesburg, South Africa.  

Ah. I know South Africa has 11 different major languages (Afrikaans, English, Zulu Language, Xhosa, Swati, Sotho, Tsonga, Tswana, Venda, Northern Sotho, Southern Ndebele), so I have to be prepared for a non-English search.  But I'm going to start in EN, assuming that I'll have good luck here.  

I also know that the English word "hail" is often used in conjunction with getting a taxi, so I start with the query: 

    [ hail taxi Johannesburg ] 

Sure, enough, the first result is a YouTube video about the "Quirky Ways of Calling Taxis in Johannesburg."  That video clued me into the idea that there was a hand-sign way to specify your destination.  Interesting.  

So when I read the 4th result on the SERP, I was tuned into looking for the word "hand" and almost immediately spotted the PDF "A Guide the Hand Signals used to Hail Taxis"  (To tell the truth, I CMD-clicked to open all top 5 results in other tabs, and then just switched between the tabs quickly, and I spotted it within about 30 seconds.)  

On that PDF I found this intriguing hand signal in the center of the chart: 

The chart is pretty convincing, but as usual, I wanted another resource.  So I did a search for 

     [ Johannesburg taxi hand signal "Orange Farm" ] 

and discovered this image: 

This image is from the South African paper, "Mail & Guardian."  Link.  Although the article
is about a health on health topics, the image and its caption answer our question.  

While reading through the SERP, I also saw a reference to "The art of taxi hand signals," an art work by Susan Woolf.  A quick search for: 

     [ the art of taxi hand signals ] 

leads me to another Mail & Guardian article about her work that points out 
...The upraised index finger indicating you are headed to town. The hand turned palm up, the fingers grasping an invisible fruit signify your destination is Orange Farm. These gestures are the framework for a complex system of transport routes...
 Ah ha.  The cupped palm is someone picking an orange.  Got it. 

Now, how about that statue with a hand signal for the Central Business District? 

The obvious search: 

     [ Johannesburg taxi hand signals statue ] 

has a row of images in the first position, one of which is clearly a set of taxi hand signals. 

Clicking through to Images, then clicking through to visit the page takes us to an article in The City Fix about the recent installation of a hand signal statue at Vilakazi Street.  

Referring back to our very first hit (the PDF of all the hand signals), it's easy to see that the hand signal for the Central Business District is there.  Marvelous! 

Search lessons:  First off, we didn't actually need to know Zulu or Afrikaans to answer this question.  Luckily, but also not entirely unexpectedly.  (The number of EN web documents in the ZA domain is much larger than the number of ZU or AF.)  

Otherwise, this Challenge was fairly straightforward.  It was really just a matter of scanning the articles you find looking for key phrases (e.g., "hand signal") and then switching back and forth between regular web search and image search.  Sometimes you'll find things in the most remarkable places. 

As an example of this, I did a search for: 

     [ Susan Woolf the art of taxi hand signals ] 

and discovered her most excellent TED talk on YouTube.  If this topic is at all interesting to you, it's worth the 14 minutes to watch.   

(Caution, teachers, the first couple of minutes include a hand sign that you might not want to show your kids. Up to you.  It's a fascinating talk, and the reason it's there is interesting.)  

Search on! 

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Wednesday search challenge (2/26/14): How do I tell where I want to go?

I'm traveling this week, so I might be a little slow in posting your responses, but that makes me think of a travel-related challenge...

Suppose I've just landed at JNB and I need to get somewhere in a hurry.  I'd like to take a taxi, but it seems so complicated!  It's almost as though you need to communicate in another language just to get around.  

Today's challenge (this sounds crazy--but trust me, there's an answer out there): 

1.  I want to take a taxi to Orange Farm.  What special things do I have to do to hail a taxi there from JNB airport?  
2.  Can you find a statue that tells you how to get to the Central Business District using this unorthodox language?  

Search on! 

Friday, February 21, 2014

Answer: How much did it cost to travel to Hawai'i in 1908?

The questions were straightforward.  

1.  How much would it cost to travel from San Francisco to Hawai'i?   
2.  About how long would it take to get from San Francisco to Honolulu?   
3.  (Extra credit) If you were an average guy living in San Francisco at the time, was this just ridiculously expensive, or could just about anyone afford the fare?  (Another way to think about this--what fraction of an average annual salary would the round-trip fare be?  If it's more than 10% of an annual paycheck, that's too much.)  

As most everyone figured out, the simplest way to find out the cost was to look in newspapers of the time for San Francisco.  Unfortunately, the Google News Archive doesn't HAVE any newspapers from San Francisco, so you have to look around for that first.  

     [ news archive San Francisco ] 

quickly leads us to the California Digital Newspaper Collection.  (The first result is for the Library of Congress collection, but they'll just point you to the CDNC.)  

At the CDNC site, you can search for: 

     [ 1908 Honolulu ] 

     [ 1908 Steamship Hawaii ] 

or something similar, and you'll find multiple hits (often in the advertisements section).  Here's one:  

Advertisement in the San Francisco Call, 16 June 1908.  From: CDNC.  

That pretty clearly answers it.  It might have been a reduced rate, but it was $110.  (And, interestingly, only $125 for a round-trip to Tahiti, which was the "normal" rate to Hawaii.)  

If you look around for a bit, you'll find there were multiple steamships travelling from San Francisco to Honolulu.  This is an ad for the S.S. Mariposa.  The S.S. Alameda also went to Hawaii.  Here's a photo that Jon (the Unknown) found with a couple contemporary ships and images of the docks. 

From Wikimedia commons archives. 
If you're interested, here's a manifest of the S.S. Alameda's passengers traveling to San Francisco from Hawaii in April 1908.  It's mostly immigrants of Spanish and Portuguese descent, looking to get away from Hawai'i.  (And one Miss Carrie Gilbert, a person of "Anglo Saxon" origin.)  

Average salary:  Figuring out the true average salary would be a great research task in-and-of itself.  But if we do a quick ballpark figure by searching for: 

     [ "average salary" 1908 San Francisco ] 

you'll get a bunch of off-topic hits.  But since this is a historical topic, I switched immediately to Books and did my search there where I found the United States Department of Education Bulletin, Issues 41-55 (covering the years 1903 - 1915).  I chose this because it would give me average salary for a school-teacher in San Francisco during those years.  

If you look at the salary table on page 74, you'll see that the average salary was around $1,000. 

But in reading around through this text, I learned that the word "wages" was often used to describe income.  I changed my query to be: 

     [ wages San Francisco 1908 ] 

which led me to a wealth of books resources.  (I found more tables of wages for different kinds of workers in 1908 than I could believe.)  Although there was a fair amount of wage disparity, the average worker seemed to make between $400 - $600 / year.  Schoolteachers seemed to be at the upper end of the income bracket.  

In any case, for most people, $110 or $125 is a big chunk of their annual income.  This certainly was above the discretionary income for most people at the time.  It was definitely something you'd save for over a number of years.  

Crossing time:  Now that we know how to find the advertisements, it's not hard to work out that the advertised crossing time was about 6 days.  (Although the actual time spent onboard might have varied up to 10 days, depending on weather, currents, etc.)   I really liked Rosemary's find of the Hittell's Hand-book of Pacific Coast Travel.  Wherein we find
"The trip from San Francisco to Honolulu is made 6 days by the steamers Mariposa and Alameda each of leaving San Francisco on the 1st and 15th of every month cabin passage $75 round trip $125 steerage $25 By sailing vessel the time may be 18 days and first cabin passage $40"  

This book was published a few years before 1908, so the prices probably had risen by 1908 to the amounts quoted above.  

It's worth noting that the price of a room in the Hawaiian Hotel in Honolulu (on Wakiki) was $3/day.  Just to calibrate the cost of travel... 

1908 was quite a year.  While looking for the answers, I also discovered that in 1908, "... Hawaiian Pineapple Growers' Association organized "to secure greater economy and improvement in the methods of cultivating, packing, transportation and marketing of pineapples and the products thereof." The Association begins a campaign to popularize use of the fruit." 

And so it began.  With the Great White Fleet providing an impressive backdrop, the Hawaiian pineapple production starts to grow.  But that's a story for another SearchResearch Challenge.  

Search lessons:  As we've seen before, you sometimes have to be aware of the language that's being used (such as not "salary" but "wage").  This is especially true for changes in language over time.  Once you find that first high-quality hit, pay attention the words and terms that are used.  They will often be valuable in the next set of searches.  

And, when searching for historical context, don't forget to search in Books and newspaper archives.  Even though Google News didn't have any SF papers, they're widely available.  Don't get bogged down just because one resource doesn't have what you want.  You can always search it out! 

Thanks for all of the comments, SearchResearchers.  You do a spectacular job on these challenges.  Keep it up! 

Thursday, February 20, 2014

Comment and a link to a SearchResearch-like story

It's pretty clear that people are finding this week's Challenge not-all-that-hard. 

 That's completely fine by me; we need a mix of both crazy-hard and simpler challenges.  The question brought up a couple of interesting bits, and in tomorrow's answer, I'll try to weave all of these pieces together.  

When I write these Challenges, they're often (about 70% of the time) actual questions that people have asked me.  Another 20% are questions that come up while I walk around or visit hither and yon.  The last 10% are questions that are intended to illustrate how to use a particular search skill or information resource.  

But I always try to keep things interesting.  (Be sure to let me know if a particular challenge just leaves you cold!)  And, in general, I think we succeed.  The world is full of fascinating things to uncover.  And each week I try to bring you a Challenge that's both interesting AND teaches a little about SearchResearch.  

So... tomorrow... the answer.  

In the meantime, if you have a couple of spare moments, let me highly recommend an article I read earlier this week.  

How to uncover a scandal from your couch, by Brad Racino and Joe Yerardi, is a great case study in how to follow a line of evidence from initial stimulus (in this case, an unsealed FBI complaint) towards a set of insights.  This is really investigative journalism at its web-search best.  A remarkable story that SearchResearchers will appreciate.  

Keep searching! 

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Wednesday search challenge (2/19/14): How much did it cost to travel to Hawai'i in 1908?

When much of the US seems to be stuck in a deep freeze, one's thoughts naturally turn to Hawai'i.  And when you think of Hawai'i, you think about traveling there. 

But at this moment, I happened to be reading a bit about President Theodore Roosevelt and his "Great White Fleet."  As you know, the GWF was a cruise of several US Naval ships in a fairly transparent display of sea power worldwide.  

In 1908, the GWF visited Hawai'i, pausing long enough to pick up new supplies, and even a few pineapples from the locals.  (Remember, at the time, pineapples were still fairly exotic.  We have them year-round these days, but in the early part of the 20th century, this was heady stuff.)  

The Great White Fleet pauses in Hawai'i for pineapples. Postcard from 1908 Hawai'i. 

This got me to thinking... My grandparents were alive in 1908, and I know it was possible to travel to Hawai'i then.  But would they? How much would it cost?  This leads to today's challenges... 

1.  How much would it cost to travel from San Francisco to Hawai'i?   
2.  About how long would it take to get from San Francisco to Honolulu?  
3.  (Extra credit) If you were an average guy living in San Francisco at the time, was this just ridiculously expensive, or could just about anyone afford the fare?  (Another way to think about this--what fraction of an average annual salary would the round-trip fare be?  If it's more than 10% of an annual paycheck, that's too much.)  

The first two challenges are pretty straightforward.  I haven't done #3 yet, but I'm interested in how you approach the question.  

As usual, let us know HOW you come to answer these questions.  We're curious about how you think about the process, about what works for you, and what doesn't work for you! 

Search on!  

Saturday, February 15, 2014

The next day... How many students?

After thinking about this last night, I realized that there was probably a simple solution to the discrepancy... if only I could figure it out.  

The basic problem is that the Census numbers of post-graduates was VERY different than the numbers from the NSF.  For example:  

     1986 - Census reports that the US graduated 100,000 doctoral students.  

     1986 - NSF reports that the US graduated 30,000 doctoral students.  

That's quite a gap.  Clearly, there's something different in the way they're both counting doctors.  

When I'm stuck on a problem like this, I will consciously try to take a very different look at the problem.  This morning I thought "Let's try Google Books!"  

So I did this query on Books: 

     [ number of doctorates awarded in US ] 

The number 1 hit was for a book called "OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2007"  This seems like a pretty credible source (when you look up OECD, the "About this site" link tell you that it's "The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.. an international economic organisation of 34 countries founded in 1961 to stimulate economic progress and world trade...")  

Interestingly, the page that I read included the phrase "the definition of postdoctorates differs among academic disciplines, universities and sectors.  For the US NSF, postdoctorates include 'individuals with science and engineering degrees  Ph.D.'s, M.D's, D.D.S's, or D.V.M's (including foreign degrees equivalent to US doctorates)."  It goes on to point out that this includes the natural sciences, mathematics, social/behavioral sciences...  

Maybe the issue is just with the definition of post-graduate degrees.  

To simplify things, I closed all of my open tabs and spreadsheets and started from scratch.  

Aside:  Because I thought this challenge would be pretty simple, I didn't bother writing down the provenance--that is, where the data came from--because I knew where each dataset had originated.  Overnight, though, all that temporary knowledge was lost.  It was a dumb move on my part.  Note to self:  ALWAYS write down where your data comes from!

I refound the Census data and the NSF data and for comparison, I found data from the NCES (National Center for Education Statistics).   

Census data set.  (See table 815 "Doctorates awarded by field of study and year of doctorate")  

NSF data set.   (See table 2.  "Institutions and doctorate recipients per institution: 1972–2012")  

NCES data set.  (SeeTable 318.20. "Bachelor's, master's, and doctor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by field of study: Selected years, 1970-71 through 2011-12") 

But NOW I had an idea:  Was there some way to subtract out some of the non-science-and-engineering disciplines to make the Census data match the NSF data?  

This time around I read the metadata more carefully.  See the note /5/ on the NCES data set?  It says: 

\5\ Includes Agriculture and natural resources; Architecture and related services; Communication, journalism, and related programs; Communications technologies; Family and consumer sciences/human sciences; Health professions and related programs; Homeland security, law enforcement, and firefighting; Legal professions and studies; Library science; Military technologies and applied sciences; Parks, recreation, leisure, and fitness studies; Precision production; Public administration and social services; Transportation and materials moving; and Not classified by field of study.
Thank heavens for good metadata that's inserted into the spreadsheet.  (Note to search-researchers:  This is an excellent practice that all of us should do.  ALWAYS add metadata!)  

That matches up (more or less) with what I'd read about in the OECD's report.  

I poured these three data sets into my spreadsheet in the tab labeled "Postgraduate numbers."  Note that I excluded Masters degrees and focused solely on PhDs just to debug this problem.  

That description above (of \5\ ) is the Other I'd been looking for.  

If you subtract all of the PhD's labeled as "Other" in the spreadsheet (see column J in my spreadsheet: here I've done the subtraction and then copied these values over into the NCES column on the other tab).  

Then, another quick chart to compare values and... 

Voila!  The green dots and line are the adjusted NCES data, subtracting out the "Other" category.  

Now you can see it:  The Census data is a count of ALL the PhD degrees issued in the US in any year... of all flavors and kinds.  The NSF data is more-or-less the same as the NCES count of PhDs MINUS all of the PhDs in the "Other" category.  

There still is a slight variation, but it's close enough that I'll accept these numbers as the full count of all PhDs (the Census data) and the science-and-engineering PhDs (the NSF or adjusted NCES numbers).  

Bottom line:  For 2012, around 47K science or engineering PhDs were awarded in the US.  That contrasts with around 170K PhDs for ALL studies combined.  

(If you're interested in this kind of topic, I highly recommend the NSF's Report on PhDs in the US.  It's full of fascinating details including analysis of ethnic identity of the students, an analysis on their parents' level of educational attainment, and how they fund their studies.)  
Search lesson:  There are many here, but I'll just point out three of them.  

1.  Don't do data analysis when you're tired.  (That was the genesis of my error, and inability, to see what was going on with the data.) 

2.  Read the metadata carefully.  Learn to love reading all those little footnotes and marginalia.  They're often key to understanding the data as a whole. 

3.  When you create data (or even temporary intermediate data sets) be sure to add in your own metadata.  Do NOT let the metadata become separated from the data.  Use the note trick (seen above) to put the metadata into the data tables themselves.  If I had done this while making my temporary worksheets, I wouldn't have had to shut everything down and restarted.  C'est la vie.  

And overall... 

Keep searching! 

Friday, February 14, 2014

Answer: How many students, how many years of school?

The challenge here comes in two parts.  

First, find the data.  Second, create a plot of it in the graphical form of choice.  

To create this chart: 

The number of people in the US with this amount of education, by year.  (In thousands.)  

I did a relatively simple search: 

     [ education data table by year ] 

In my SERP, the 3rd result was the link to the website.  A quick click took me to the data tables for "Educational Attainment," a phrase that I learned was the correct description of what I was searching.  (I did also check out the website "National Center for Education Statistics," but couldn't figure out how to download decades worth of attainment data.  I gave up on that pretty quickly and turned to 

The link labeled "Time series data" looked pretty reasonable to me, and when you click through, you see their graphs and links to their data sets.

You can see there's a graph (on the left) that's pretty much what I asked for (and it would have been okay to stop there).  But I like to get the data for myself, just so I can check what other have done, and possibly re-analyze the data in my own way.  In my case, I summarized all of the post-graduate numbers together.

So I right-clicked on the CSV file and downloaded it to my desktop.  (It's control+click on a Mac.  If you're an Excel user, right-clicking on the XLS file is what you want to do to download it.) 

This copies the CSV to my desktop, and then I can create a Google Spreadsheet and import the data into it.  

I choose to create a spreadsheet rather than a Fusion Table (as Rosemary did) because I didn't think I'd need any of the advanced features of FT.  (It's also easy to import a spreadsheet into a Fusion Table, so it wouldn't be hard to change in any case.)  

I just left all of the defaults about "Import action" and "separator character"to be what they are at the start.  The import process usually gets it right, and in this case, you can see a preview on the right hand side.  

Then, when you click the blue "Import" button, your spreadsheet will look like this.  

My educational data spreadsheet (if you'd like to look at it).  

And at this point, you just select the data (from cell C11 to I69) and click on Insert>Chart 

Note that I've highlighted the "Use row 11 as headers"  AND the "Use column C as labels" buttons.  This is what sets up the chart to plot properly from left to right and create the colors index on the right side of the chart.  

Then all that's left is to modify the labels, and you've got the chart.  

Extra credit: Remember that I'd hoped to find the students with post-graduate years of study as well? 

I was able to find data tables of "degrees granted" by year, but not number in the same format as in the previous data set.  Remember:  those numbers in the chart above are the TOTAL number of people, by year, with that level of educational attainment.

(Yes, I could have looked up the US population for each year and divided... But I took the lazy way out, since I was really curious about the actual numbers of post-graduate degrees attained in any given year.) 

And here's where I went down an interesting rat-hole.  

I did the query: 

     [ number of doctorates awarded US ] 

and found what looked like the perfect answer at the National Science Foundation.  They have a data table "Graduates and post-graduates in science and engineering" (but which includes data on humanities).  They have numbers from the 1940s, so I thought it would be a great resource.  However, when I plot all of the numbers (from both Census and NSF), I see a plot like this:  

It LOOKS like NSF is underreporting (by a factor of 3) OR that the Census is over-estimating the number of degrees awarded each year.  

What's going on? 

I got the NSF data from their data site: 

And I got the Census data from their data site.

I've read both of these data tables for a while now, and haven't yet figured out why they're so different.  

The NSF data comes from their survey of graduating PhDs, but they claim a 98% return rate on the surveys.  That missing 2% won't make up the difference in the data.  

Search lesson:  If you want ALL of the data in a time series, search for "time series"--that's the coded language for data collected over time.  

Perhaps most importantly, be prepared to spend time reading over the metadata (that is, the information about the data set) that describes what the data is and how it was collected.  

And when you find discrepancies in the data, embrace the differences and try to figure out what's going on.  (I put both data sets onto a single chart, just to see the differences.)  

Status:  I'll keep working on this over the weekend, but if you figure out why the data is SO different, post a comment.  We'll figure this out together!  

Searching on.... 

Thursday, February 13, 2014

Comment: How many students, how many years of school?

You're all doing quite well.  Nice work! 

As many of you have figured out, one of the key phrases here is "educational attainment."  As the government defines it:  "Educational attainment refers to the highest level of education that an individual has completed. This is distinct from the level of schooling that an individual is attending."  

The kinds of answers for the educational attainment question vary slightly by survey, but generally include the following categories:
  • No schooling completed, or less than 1 year
  • Nursery, kindergarten, and elementary (grades 1-8)
  • High school (grades 9-12, no degree)
  • High school graduate (or equivalent)
  • Some college (1-4 years, no degree)
  • Associate’s degree (including occupational or academic degrees)
  • Bachelor’s degree (BA, BS, AB, etc)
  • Master’s degree (MA, MS, MENG, MSW, etc)
  • Professional school degree (MD, DDC, JD, etc)
  • Doctorate degree (PhD, EdD, etc)

And the obvious source of data about this (for the US) would be the Census Bureau (they're at )  An interesting question for a future SRS challenge would be to do this same question for another country.  (I'm looking at you Ramón!)  

In my case, I found their CSV data files, and then was able to use Google Spreadsheets to create the graph I showed yesterday.  

Enough of a hint??  

Search on! 

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Wednesday search challenge (2/12/14): How many students, how many years of school?

As you know, I'm really interested in education at many levels.  I taught graduate level computer science for 12 years, I've taught classes in 4th grade and high school, and I've even taught Googlers and rocket scientists at NASA how to search more effectively.  

But I always wonder--how well are students doing?  

A simple measure of that is to figure out how many years of school do students in the US take before they move on to other things?  

That's the question at the heart of today's challenge.  When I thought of this question, it took me about 5 minutes to find the data, download it, and create the following graph.  

Chart showing number of US students and the number of years of education they have, by year

As you can see, this is a stacked graph showing the number of students in the US by year.  Each color represents the fraction of students that have achieved N years of completion.  As you can see, the purple segment (students who have had 1 - 3 years of college) has always been about the same size as the number of students who have graduated from college.  

Today's Search Challenge:  
1.  Can you create (or find) a graph with this same data?  (That is, students with N years of schooling, from the years 1940 through 2013.)  
2.  (Extra credit)  Can you add students with post-graduate years of study as well?  (That is, students who have gone to graduate school, attained a Masters, PhD, or other degree, e.g., MD, JD, EdD, etc.  This should be a thin line atop this chart.)  

Be sure to tell us HOW you found your data (what searches did you do?  what resources did you check out?).  If you spent a long time in a rathole, let us know that too.  

I'll comment tomorrow, then show my answer on Friday and reveal my data source.  

There's no time pressure to answer this quickly, but I'm curious about how long it takes you to figure out the answer to this.  
P.S.  Don't bother doing a Search-By-Image.  I downloaded this data from somewhere and created this graph myself.  I hope you'll do the same.  Once you have the data like this, you can examine it in many different ways.  

Search on! 

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

A bit about Eckley...

While I was in Eckley taking pictures of the wreck of the Garden City ferry, I also wandered around a bit in the area that was the former village.  
Mamie Gonsolves-Perry (ca. 1920) with her cousin, standing in front of their home at Eckley.
From the book "Port Costa," image originally from
You can see the telegraph lines behind her, they're next to the railroad track,
 following the coastline.

It's clear that this little area was once both an active brickmaking site (although only one "Eckley brick" structure remains near the pier), and a little village where people actually lived, worked, and played.  

One of the things that struck me was the occurrence of flowers at the edge of the park.  These are jonquils (aka narcissus), and they're not native to this area.  They don't migrate easily, so this is the remnant of someone's flower garden.  

In truth, this is what first caught my attention when I was wandering around at the Eckley pier.  These flowers are blooming early (in February!) and are very much out-of-place.  

And that made me start wondering.  What was it like to grow up here?  What did this place look like when it was still an active place?  

The best I could do was to find some aerial images from 1944.  This is 20 years after the first photo was taken.  One house clearly remains, although the place seems to be mostly parking lot.  That house is long gone, of course.  I was able to spot a few fragments of what seemed to be foundation, but it's history now.  

I'm still looking for pictures taken AT (or in) Eckley, the town itself.  It's not clear to me that there are any that are online, although I'm willing to bet that the Contra Costa Historical Society has some.  I'll try to stop by next time I'm up there.  

Still searching... 

____________________ Added later:  Thursday, Feb 13, 2014 _____________

While searching for a few things about Eckley, I ran across an article that referred to the village as "Eckley Station."  Using THIS as a quoted string with the state name given (to eliminate results from PA OR Pennsylvania:  

      [ "Eckley Station" CA OR California ] 

In particular, the CNDC (California Newspaper Digital Collection) has several hits which are pretty interesting.  

From: Daily Alta California, Volume 37, Number 12543, 16 August 1884

Post Costa, August 15th. — There was another close-call fire in the lower part of Port Costa between twelve and one o'clock last night. At Eckley Station, a tramp set fire to Henry Eckley's barn, which, with some hay, grain and tools was totally destroyed. The fire, unchecked, rapidly spread, burning over five acres of wild oat land. Some fifteen fine large buildings, and a large amount of grain and hay were saved only through the great exertions of the Eckleys and the neighbors. The total loss is $2,500. There was no insurance. 

(Fifteen buildings lost, and the damage was $2,500?  Life was less expensive then.)  

Just two years later, in 13 August, 1885, the Santa Cruz Sentinel reports that another fire destroyed a "hotel and a cottage" in Eckley Station. 

Eckley Station lost 18 buildings in just one year.  (Both in August, when the area is very dry and fires are a constant hazard.)   

While in the Daily Alta (Daily Alta California, Volume 81, Number 102, 10 October 1889we learn in the Personal section of the paper (back then, newspapers would often report personal news, such as who was visiting whom... a kind of detail that we today would find an unacceptable level of disclosure!) that "John L. Eckley, a merchant of Eckley Station, is at the Grand."  Meaning, that John Eckley, who lives in Eckley Station, is currently staying at the Grand Hotel in San Francisco.  Similarly, just two years earlier (13 July 1887) we see a Personal entry that "John L. Eckley, wealthy rancher, resident at Eckley Station, is stopping at the Grand." 

I find it interesting that someone visiting from across the Bay, described as a "wealthy rancher" or "a merchant" would be noteworthy.  But so it goes.  Perhaps because in news reports after this he is referred to as the "founder of Eckley Station."  

A bit later in the SERP I find a reference to the San Francisco Directory of 1888, which lists ECKLEY J I, Spring Dale Water Co and Tug Hiawaiha, 281 East, res Eckley Station, Contra Costa Co.  (We've talked about the valuable role of city directories in the 1800's before when we discussed finding out about Art Thorpe.)  

In the 1895 directory John Eckley is listed as having:  "office Mission St. Wharf 1, r. Eckley Station"  (where "r." means "residence").  

Continuing on this this vein (using "Eckley Station" as our key term) leads to all kinds of additional content.  Perhaps the most telling is from Google Books, which has back issues of the journal "Clay-Worker."  In issue 45 (1906), we learn that the "new Carquinez Brick and Tile company has leased a great tract of land" at Eckley Station, planning to build a new brick plant that can produce 100,000 bricks / day, and employ 75 men.  

A brick-press machine from 1906 (when Eckley Station would have been making bricks).

Search lesson #1:  When reading, take note of special formations of the words you seek.  Sometimes a particular word pair (such as "Eckley Station") can lead you to MUCH richer results.  

Search lesson #2: There are multiple Eckleys in the world.  In this case, the city in Pennsylvania was intruding into our results.  By adding [ CA OR California ] (and later, I added [ -PA -Pennsylvania ] we can improve the focus of the results.  

Keep searching! 


Post script...  

Perhaps my favorite find with the [ "Eckley Station" ] query was the following.  I'll let you read the story about John Eckley and the amazing swallowed pocketknife.  

This is from the Daily Gazette (Fort Wayne, IN), 25 November, 1885.