Wednesday, April 15, 2020

Answer: What are the names?


This one was pure fun... 


Names (for things, people, places, songs, continents, concepts) are important!  

The Challenge for this week was to identify a few names that might not be what you think!  

These weren't especially difficult, but they bring up a really good point: A name might not be what you think it is.  It's worth doing just a bit more digging.  For instance... 


1. Who is Allison Guyot?  Why this is a memorable name?  What does Allison Guyot look like? 

The query:   

     [ Allison Guyot ] 

quickly leads us to the Wikipedia article, telling us that Allison Guyot is a tablemount (that is, a guyot) in the underwater Mid-Pacific Mountains of the Pacific Ocean.  This particular guyot is west of Hawaii and northeast of the Marshall Islands.  At the time of its formation, the atoll (from which this came) was located in the Southern Hemisphere and tectonically drifted to its current position.  

It's a memorable name because it looks like someone's regular name; I could imagine meeting Allison Guyot and saying hi.  

But in fact it's a submerged, truncated mountaintop that's named for E.C. Allison, an oceanographer and paleontologist at San Diego State College, California.  

I couldn't find any good images of Allison Guyot, but I did find a generic image of a guyot on the Wikipedia page for guyot:  



And, by checking Google Scholar, I was able to find many articles about Allison Guyot (especially about the tiny fossils found there).  This article by Edward Winterer (et al.) included a great cross-section image of Allison Guyot as seen by sonar, way out in the deep waters of the Pacific Northwest.  

p/c Winterer, et al. (see link below) 


Winterer, Edward L., and Christopher V. Metzler. "Origin and subsidence of guyots in Mid‐Pacific Mountains." Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 89.B12 (1984): 9969-9979.


2. Who is Franklin Dixon? 

Again, not hard, but I didn't know that Franklin W. Dixon is the pen name used by a variety of different authors  who wrote The Hardy Boys novels for the Edward Stratemeyer Syndicate, as well as for the Ted Scott Flying Stories series published by Grosset & Dunlap.

Charles Leslie McFarlane, a Canadian author, was the originator of the series.  He wrote 19 of the first 25 books in the series.

The books sell more than a million copies each year, and several new volumes are added to the list each year.  The tales have been translated into more than 25  languages.



3. Who wrote the Nancy Drew mysteries?

My query was: 

     [ author of Nancy Drew books ] 

Aha!  I did not know that the Nancy Drew books were ALSO created by publisher Edward Stratemeyer as the female counterpart to the Hardy Boys series.  Mildred Wirt Benson (July 10, 1905–May 28, 2002) was the original Carolyn Keene, writing 23 of the original series, beginning #1, The Secret of the Old Clock.

Like the Hardy Boy series, the Nancy Drew books are incredibly popular (translated into 45 languages). And, under the direction of Stratemeyer, the books are ghostwritten by a number of authors and published under the collective pseudonym Carolyn Keene.  

So who was Stratemeyer?  How did he come to be the director of such successful series? 

Do the obvious search, and I learn that Edward L. Stratemeyer (October 4, 1862 – May 10, 1930) was an American publisher and writer of children's fiction. 

In addition, he was one of the most prolific writers in the world, producing more than 1,300 books himself, with sales exceeding 500 million copies. 

He also created well-known fictional series for young adults, including The Rover Boys, The Bobbsey Twins, Tom Swift, The Hardy Boys, and Nancy Drew series.  




4. What is the name of this symbol?     ÷ 
      (yes, I know it’s the division symbol… what’s the REAL name of it?)

All I did was the query: 

     [ ÷ ]  

(Yes... you can query just single characters!) 

I found that it's the symbol for division, properly named the obelus.  

Using this character to represent division, though common, is not universally recommended: the ISO 80000-2 standard for mathematical notation recommends only the solidus (/) or fraction bar for division, or the colon for ratios; it says that this symbol "should not be used" for division.


5. What's the name of this other symbol?  Ꮬ

I included this character because it's still a surprise to some searchers that you can search for special characters.  In this case, it's a letter of the Cherokee syllabary, transcribed as syllable dla.

You could also find this character by drawing it in Google Docs (as I discussed in SRS Aug 28, 2014, which showed how to draw the symbol for recognition, as well as ShapeCatcher.com, which does the same thing).  

Remmij pointed out another online charater reco app at Mausr.com.  These are all great.  (And if one doesn't work for you, try another... or brush up on your drawing skills.)  


6.  How about THIS character?  ⌘

Doing a search for this character leads you into a fascinating rabbithole of discovery.  Most internet denizens recognize it as Apple's command key symbol, but it's also called the looped square, and is commonly used throughout Scandinavia (and a bit beyond) on road signs to indicate places of historical or cultural interest.  

Somewhere in Sweden near a point of interest.

But since it's ALSO used on Macintosh keyboards, the character has accreted a few other terms as well.  If you're looking for this character in a computing (specifically an Apple/Mac context), you might want to know that some people also call this the Command key (⌘),  the Apple key, clover key, open-Apple key, splat, pretzel, drone (rare), or propeller.  

You can also find this called a Bowen knot.  

One symbol, but 10 different terms.  

6. What’s the difference between these two characters:     

                        /             \

We already saw that the right-leaning slash (the first character) is called the solidus, commonly representing division.  Let's not stop there--let's do the search: 

     [ / ] 

Oddly, this doesn't do a search for the character if you do your search from the ADDRESS bar on the Chrome and Firefox browsers it shows a listing of your computer's file system.  If you do this on Safari, it shows you what you'd expect.  

IF, on the other hand, you do your Google query from the good old query box, you'll get what you expect--the results.  Take note:  The address bar in your browser might give very different results!  (This doesn't happen often, but a few things like this crop up from time to time.)  



From this search we see that this character is called a slash (the most common name), but also known as a stroke, virgule, diagonal, right-leaning stroke, oblique dash, solidus, slant, separatrix, forward slash.  I also learned that there are three different kinds of the slash character, each specialized for different typesetting needs.  


Fascinating.  

But what about the left-leaning slash (the second character)?  

Doing the same search (although with the \ character) tells us that it is sometimes called a backslash, a hack, a whack, an escape (from C/UNIX), reverse slash, slosh, downwhack, backslant, backwhack, bash, reverse slant, and reversed virgule.. and sometimes even a reversed solidus.  


SearchResearch Lessons


1. Careful with certain special queries!  As we see, the query [ / ] produces unexpected results IF you do it in the address bar.  Another one to be careful about is "chrome"... which has all kinds of alternative completions.  So... if you see something odd / interesting, try it in the other search box.  

2. Check the meaning (and names) of things you think you already know.  We've talked about this before, but making sure you know what something is (or what it means) AND learning other ways of describing that thing--that's a valuable habit to pick up.  


I hope you enjoyed this fun/easy SearchResearch Challenge.



AND.. a special announcement:  I started up a new YouTube channel.  You might find Search Education to be an interesting thing to subscribe to...  


I've pushed a few short videos there (as advertised a couple of posts ago).  If you subscribe, you'll be the first to see the videos!  


Search on!  

Thursday, April 9, 2020

Using Google Trends to find COVID data



In a recent article for the New York Times, 

Seth Stephens-Davidowitz published a fascinating story (Google Searches Can Help Us Find Emerging Covid-19 Outbreaks) about using Google Trends to find coronavirus outbreaks in other countries, as well as finding unexpected side-effects of the virus.  

A few people then asked me if Google knows this, why doesn't it tell us?  The short answer is "you have to go looking for it."  Here's why:  

The article by Stephens-Davidowitz is the story about his use of Google Trends to discover what people are searching for about coronavirus.  That is, he had the clever idea to use the Trends data to DISCOVER these effects in the data.  The Google Trends system has all kinds of phenomena in it as revealed through the lens of what people are searching for.  
As an example, look at this Trend graph for "kayaking" in the web search dataset for the United States.  



That's not a surprise.  Kayaking searches surge in the summertime.  Makes sense.  There are thousands of such observations that can be made by looking at the Google Trends data.  

But in the NY Times article, Stephens-Davidowitz points out that a similarly surging query in Trends is [I can't smell] and an even more obviously surging query is [loss of smell].  

Here's the Trend graph for this query [loss of smell] (US only, past 30 days): 



As interesting as this is, it's even more dramatic when you take into account more of the temporal context.  Here's that same query trending over the past 5 years: 


That uptick at the end is an amazingly large response and puts the current search query volume in context.  This year is NOT like other years.  

Likewise for other common COVID symptoms: 


But notice this chart (below) about fever--see the annual cycle in the wintertime? That's to be expected. Yes, there's an uptick this year (far right side), but seeing the context of the previous five winters' worth of fevers makes the severity of THIS year much more apparent.  

This is true in other countries/languages as well.  If you ask about fevers in Italy (using the Italian word febbre), you see something similar. 


Same thing happens with another COVID symptom--fatigue.  There's an annual drop in fatigue queries right at Christmas (I've marked Dec 25 of each year with arrows).  It's not a huge signal, but interesting nonetheless.  

Searches for [fatigue] over the past 5 years.  The arrows point out the lowest volume of searches across the year, which happens to be at Christmas.  I'll let you figure out why this might be true. 

Even so, there's a distinct uptick in [fatigue] queries as well this spring, even though it's not quite as obvious as the other ones.   

There's a great of information within Google Trends--but you have to go looking for it.. it won't magically raise its hand and say "here I am!"  

A really interesting post to read on this topic is Coronavirus Search Trends (written by the Google Trends team) that shows the latest breakout queries at both a national and worldwide level.  These are queries that have suddenly spiked in volume--a real indicator of what people are interested in finding out more about!  

So while Google Trends is a great resource for researchers, you still have to go digging a little bit into the content in order to see what's happening.  

Enjoy exploring with Trends.  Let us know what you find! 

Search on! 






Wednesday, April 8, 2020

SearchResearch Challenge (4/8/20): What are the names?


Names aren't as simple as you'd think... 


As we know, having the right name for something can be very important in doing your online research. (We've talked about this before: terms, part names, geo and bio names. We'll probably talk about it in the future too.)    


This week's Challenges aren't that hard, but I hope you have fun with them.  

Here are some names (of people, places, and things) that might not be what you think!  


1. Who is Allison Guyot?  Why this is a memorable name?  What does Allison Guyot look like? 

2. Who is Franklin Dixon? 

3. Who wrote the Nancy Drew mysteries?

4. What is the name of this symbol?     ÷ 
      (yes, I know it’s the division symbol… what’s the REAL name of it?)

5. What's the name of this other symbol?  Ꮬ

6.  How about THIS character?  ⌘

6. What’s the difference between these two characters:     

                        /             \


Have fun while you keep your physical distance!  

And let us know how you figured it out!  

Search on!  


Monday, April 6, 2020

A few SearchResearch short videos about finding credible medical content


As you might recall... 

I put out a short video, a One-Minute Morceau (aka 1MM) on my Search Education YouTube channel this week. 

Each is a short video between 1 and 5 minutes long with a brief SRS strategy or tactic for you.  

I added a 3rd video today, which is why I'm collecting them here.  If you want, you could always subscribe to my SearchEducation channel!  (If you see the red "Subscribe" button on the video, click on it, and you'll be subscribed in a trice.  


1.  Finding high quality information about treatments 

 
2.  How to assess the credibility of a web site 


3.   Is this a credible author? 


 

Let me know how you like them!  
If I get encouraging feedback, I'll keep it up.  
Search on!  

Wednesday, April 1, 2020

Answer: What research questions are YOU searching out these days? (The COVID-19 edition of SRS)


Complex questions... 

... abound in these days of COVID-19 / coronavirus.  


P/C CDC.govhttps://www.cdc.gov/


This week's Challenge was: 


1.  During the past 2 weeks, what SearchResearch Challenges have you confronted about COVID-19 / Coronavirus?  

2.  What did you do to try and answer those Research Questions?  

Let me summarize the comments (and emails) from SRS readers.  


Arthur is concerned about how to tamp down fake news about false (or downright dangerous) "cures" and "treatments" for COVID.  


He asks a great question: How do we assess the accuracy of the various treatments that we read about (e.g. terrible ideas like hair dryers pointed down the throat; Vitamin C; vodka; garlic; oregano; colloidal silver... or even, God forbid, drinking bleach).  

How to assess treatments:  Here's a link to my short YouTube video about this.  The TL;DR version of that is (1) do at least two searches (for the treatment, and another that searches for a contraindication).  (2) Search for the treatment and a context search term like "hoax" "credible" or "fraud."  (One could write a book on this topic alone.  But you should watch the video.)  

Arthur points out that there are several excellent Fact Checking sites that have set up special COVID pages.  He pointed us to FactCheck.AFP.com It's a high quality European site that debunks many of the rumors and crazy stories you hear. 

Another such site worth monitoring is Snopes, especially with the search [ covid OR coronavirus ] -- here's the link to Snopes for you to use to search just in Snopes for fact check articles that they've written.   

Other well-known fact-checking sites are running special COVID pages (or searches over their fact checks): 

   FactCheck.org COVID fact checking
   USAToday COVID fact checking
   Poynter.org COVID  fact checking
   Politifact.org COVID fact checking

Of course, you can check with your favorite trusted news source with this pattern: 

     [ site:X.Y  factcheck COVID OR coronavirus ] 


In particular, as you read about COVID, beware of stories that don't have clear attributions.  If you can't figure out who wrote the original story, read it cautiously.   

Clayton points out that the overall data about COVID is terrible, so stop obsessing over it.  I hear you!  

I agree with him--the data is terrible.  The sampling has been abysmal and worst of all, it's heavily biased in ways that we don't know.  I can de-bias some data, but if we don't know much about the testing protocols (who gets tested, when, and why) and the accuracy of the tests, then it's hard to draw accurate conclusions.  (To be honest, I don't really look at "people tested" or "positive" or "negative."  I look just at deaths--that's probably the most accurate number of all, and even it is biased.)  

Clayton also points out the best summary of the situation that he's found.  Coronavirus: Why you must act now (by Tomas Pueyo)   Also read his follow-up article, The Hammer and the Dance which summarizes a lot of implications along with reasonable predictions about what will happen over the next several months.    

Ramón has been asking good questions in his research: Will weather slow the virus?  What medicines work? Is chloroquine really is helping?  

He did a nice query about cholorquine: 

     [chloroquine Marseille coronavirus] 

Why "Marseille" in that query?  Because some of the earliest work on  the effectiveness of choloroquine was done by Didier Raoult at La Timone hospital in Marseille, France--or at least he rose to prominence with a YouTube video promising a "way out of the crisis" with choloroquine.   

But as this kind of early-pandemic study shows, you can't trust the  data so far... too small.   It's promising, it's possible--and we have to wait for the real data analysis to be done.  We don't want a repeat of the thalidomide tragedy, where a drug was released into the population without careful work showing devastating side-effects.  (Thalidomide was sold as a sleep-aid, but only after a year did the terrible side-effects of birth defects show up.)  

Information is changing rapidly.  What we know now might well shift in a few days or weeks.  There's a lot of ongoing research these days--you have to keep your information channels up to date!   

Remmij points to the Library of Congress "Corona Resource Guide," which is great, although very policy-wonk friendly.  Note that the publication date is March 20, 2020.  Things are changing rapidly, and this (along with every other COVID site) needs to be updated frequently if it's going to stay accurate and relevant.  They did promise to update it (but as of today, it's still more than a week stale).     


Search Lessons 

There are really two big lessons from this post: 

1.  Stay up to date!  News about COVID changes moment by moment.  Is Ibuprofen good or bad?  The data changes, and might change again.  Will chloroquine or redemsivir prove to be the magic drug?  It's a bit too early to tell. 

2. Use SITE: as a way to drill into websites that you trust.  There's SO much news these days that it's difficult to see the forest for the trees.  Using SITE: lets you search for the information you seek from a place you trust. 

3. Use the time restriction filter to get the latest updates.  It's part of the "Tools" option.  Like this: 



Stay healthy, wash your hands... and...  Search on! 



Another note...  I put out two "One-Minute Morceaux" this week. Each is a short video between 1 and 5 minutes long with a brief SRS strategy or tactic for you.  
1.  How to find high quality information about treatments 

 
2.  How to assess the credibility of a web site. 


 

Let me know how you like them!